[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH][RFC] Proposal for a new watchdog interface using sysfs
    On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 15:58:17 MST, Matt Porter said:

    > Yes, and on embedded SoC devices we have watchdog facilities sitting
    > on an internal chip bus. It would be nice to find access points in
    > a uniform place on any Linux system. i.e. PCI watchdog on my x86 desktop
    > is in the same place as the on-chip watchdog on my PPC44x system.
    > IMHO, anything else would be a logical step backwards from accessing
    > /dev/watchdog across platforms.

    I admit not having thoroughly read the source to check - is the userspace API
    for accessing all these chips fairly uniform and rational, so that a user
    program can be reasonably sure that if stat("/dev/watchdog") returns zero, that
    it knows how to deal with it? Or are they all sufficiently close to the "keep
    reloading a countdown timer from userspace, and if it ever doesn't get reloaded,
    kick the kernel in the seat of the pants" programming model? Of course, even
    a disagreement on the units of the timer could be bad - a seconds/milliseconds
    clash could result is a *real* fast lack-of-joy situation.. ;)

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.020 / U:4.392 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site