![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I guess the bitkeeper network protocol could be also implemented on the > longer run, it should be much faster to fetch all the database that way, Nobody (who is covered by copyright laws) is allowed to use the _free_ version of BitKeeper to reverse engineer the protocol. I may be mistaken - perhaps the BitKeeper "anti-competition" clause would be found unenforcable.. but I'm not interested in going there. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:33 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||