lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: interrupt latency ?
On Mon, 10 February 2003 13:30:49 -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, [iso-8859-1] J?rn Engel wrote:
>
> > An assembler interrupt handler that saves registers, tweaks a couple
> > of bits, restores registers and gets the hell out of here should be in
> > the order of 100 cycles, maybe less. Why is linux wasting all this
> > time?
>
> FYI execution speed and interrupt latency doesn't scale well. You
> are most always I/O bound somewhere.

Ack. It always takes a moment to get used to these facts.

Jörn

--
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, but
not tried it.
-- Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site