lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 11 Feb 2003 12:01:09 +0100
FromJens Axboe <>
SubjectRe: stochastic fair queueing in the elevator [Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20-ck3 / aa / rmap with contest]
On Mon, Feb 10 2003, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > The design I proposed is to have multiple I/O queues, where to apply the
> > elevator, and to choose the queue in function of the task->pid that is
> > sumbitting the bh/bio. You'll have to apply an hash to the pid and you
> > probably want a perturbation timer that will change the hash function
> > every 30 sec or so. Plus I want a special queue for everything
> > asynchronoys. So that the asynchronoys queue will be elevated and
> 
> What about adding speicial queue (queues?) for niced things? That way
> nice -20 job would not interfere with normal processes, not even for
> I/O.

Once you have per-process queues, it's fairly trivial to add stuff like
that.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:33    [W:0.307 / U:0.170 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans