Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 10 Feb 2003 10:19:19 +0100 | From | Tomas Szepe <> | Subject | Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance |
| |
> [jgarzik@pobox.com] > > Given the existing TinyCC source base, function inlining is a big step > (since tcc doesn't do AST-like things currently), so don't expect that > very soon. TinyCC is a fun little project to watch and play around > with, though, and can compile most major open source projects, as well > as itself.
I wonder how that can be, though, because I've failed getting it to compile code as trivial as
walk_de = (dirent_t *) debug_malloc(sizeof(dirent_t));
where dirent_t is a simple structure and debug_malloc is prototyped to void *debug_malloc(size_t size);
-- Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |