Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [Lse-tech] gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance | From | Falk Hueffner <> | Date | 10 Feb 2003 21:49:19 +0100 |
| |
Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> BTW, in case any gcc hacker is paying attention, the documentation > fails to mention the gcc version required for this or any other > attribute. Also it would be nice to have an option to ditch the > (char*) exception; it's junk when you have __may_alias__.
I don't think a switch that makes standard compliant source break in potentially very subtle ways is a good idea. Just use "restrict".
-- Falk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |