lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
From
Date
Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net> writes:

> BTW, in case any gcc hacker is paying attention, the documentation
> fails to mention the gcc version required for this or any other
> attribute. Also it would be nice to have an option to ditch the
> (char*) exception; it's junk when you have __may_alias__.

I don't think a switch that makes standard compliant source break in
potentially very subtle ways is a good idea. Just use "restrict".

--
Falk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.032 / U:0.656 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site