[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: stochastic fair queueing in the elevator [Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 03:49:59PM +0100, Giuliano Pochini wrote:
> >> You can wait 10 minutes and still such command can't grow. This is why
> >> claiming anticipatory scheduling can decrease the need for readahead
> >> doesn't make much sense to me, there are important things you just can't
> >> achieve by only waiting.
> >>
> >
> > The anticipatory scheduler can easily permit 512k of reading before seeking
> > away to another file. In fact it can allow much more, without requiring that
> > readhead be cranked up.
> IMHO anticipatory scheduling and readahead address different problems. RA is
> simpler and cheaper. Reading a few more KB comes almost for free and that
> helps a lot sequential reads. AS is useful for random i/o (fs metadata,
> executables, ...), but it wastes time if the timer expires, or if the new
> request wants data which is far away the previous one. AS is useful for


> sequential reads too, but only if the application reads large chunks of
> data, otherwise RA is better. I we need both RA and AS to address the

actually even if the app reads large chunks of data RA is needed, the
size of the read/io_submit syscalls won't reach the
readpage/wait_on_page at the pagecache layer, w/o readahead we would
read PAGE_SIZE per dma and not more (ignoring PAGE_CACHE_SIZE of course,
which isn't going to be enough anyways due mem fragmentation issues)

> largest variety of workloads.
> Bye.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.124 / U:2.920 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site