Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:00:51 +0300 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: stochastic fair queueing in the elevator [Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20-ck3 / aa / rmap with contest] |
| |
Andrew Morton wrote:
>Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> wrote: > > >>Is it true that there is no manpage available anywhere for fadvise? >> >> >> > >It's pretty simple. > >http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/posix_fadvise.html > >It's also basically unimplementable without the radix tree, so I don't how >other systems can be doing it. Maybe they just lock up for a day when >someone does fadvise64(fd, 0, -1, FADV_DONTNEED) ;) > > > > > Andrew, don't you think you should write a linux manpage and/or other documentation when you add system calls like fadvise to linux? Also, Andrew, your measurements would be a lot more understandable if you did not use programs written by you and not present in any linux distro (do I understand that correctly?) without defining what they do. Yes? ;-)
-- Hans
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |