Messages in this thread | | | From | "David Schwartz" <> | Subject | RE: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause? | Date | Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:47:53 -0800 |
| |
> Is the GPL in effect for the kernel so that anybody can enhance the > current drivers and add support for any other device? If two companies > develop competing products and those products (albeit a few slight > differences) perform the same operations using almost the same hardware, > do we want one company to use the others driver?
Assuming all the drivers are offered under the GPL, the kernel inclusion process is a meritocracy. In other words, good code gets added and bad code doesn't.
The GPL provides unrestricted joinder and severance, so if the driver is GPL and the kernel is GPL, anyone who wants to can join them together under the GPL can do so. Linus would likely do this officially if the driver is reasonable, and anyone who cares enough can do the work needed to get it suitable for inclusion if the original company that offered the driver doesn't want to.
DS
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |