Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:12:17 -0800 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: [patch] sched-HT-2.6.0-test11-A5 |
| |
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Why not per_cpu for __rq_idx[] and __cpu_idx[]? This would have the >> advantage of residing on node-local memory for sane architectures (and >> perhaps in the future, some insane ones).
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 07:21:14PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > agreed, i've changed them to be per-cpu. > new patch with all your suggestions included is at: > redhat.com/~mingo/O(1)-scheduler/sched-SMT-2.6.0-test11-C1 > it also includes the bounce-to-cpu1 fix from/for Anton.
This looks pretty good, thanks.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |