[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?
    Jesse Pollard <> wrote:

    > It is if you are referring to the Kernel. Look at the include
    > files. They are licened under GPL.
    > Look at the include files for applications. They are licenced
    > under LGPL.

    Really? Have you looked at the include files for Linux? The standard C
    include files that nearly every program uses will end up also *including*
    Linux kernel header files in order to build programs for Linux. Not all
    programs will end up including those files, but a very large portion

    If you don't believe me, do a grep under /usr/include/sys on your machine
    for 'linux', and see how many of the header files include stuff from
    /usr/include/linux. All the files under /usr/include/linux are part of
    the kernel, so theoretically under the pure GPL, not LGPL.

    Then again I say 'theoretically' because once again there is nary a
    kernel header file in sight that actually *has* a GPL license header
    attached! So who knows what license those files are *really* under.


    Kendall Bennett
    Chief Executive Officer
    SciTech Software, Inc.
    Phone: (530) 894 8400

    ~ SciTech SNAP - The future of device driver technology! ~

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.019 / U:43.176 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site