[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?
Jesse Pollard <> wrote:

> It is if you are referring to the Kernel. Look at the include
> files. They are licened under GPL.
> Look at the include files for applications. They are licenced
> under LGPL.

Really? Have you looked at the include files for Linux? The standard C
include files that nearly every program uses will end up also *including*
Linux kernel header files in order to build programs for Linux. Not all
programs will end up including those files, but a very large portion

If you don't believe me, do a grep under /usr/include/sys on your machine
for 'linux', and see how many of the header files include stuff from
/usr/include/linux. All the files under /usr/include/linux are part of
the kernel, so theoretically under the pure GPL, not LGPL.

Then again I say 'theoretically' because once again there is nary a
kernel header file in sight that actually *has* a GPL license header
attached! So who knows what license those files are *really* under.


Kendall Bennett
Chief Executive Officer
SciTech Software, Inc.
Phone: (530) 894 8400

~ SciTech SNAP - The future of device driver technology! ~

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.520 / U:0.296 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site