![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Matthias Andree wrote: > On Wed, 03 Dec 2003, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > It's fragile currently, and if there are changes that make the beast > > > solid, I'm all for it, and the whole discussion can be killed right here > > > because it's a "bugfix" in that case. After all, autofs4 is a > > > pre-something stuff and going "gold" is certainly a fix. > > > > And that would be 4.1.0-beta3 you are talking about right? > > Perhaps you could tell me about your problems and I'll put them on my > > growing todo list for 4.1.1. > > I'd need to find and evaluate your 4.1.0-beta works first. Oops, I've > got it, I should look into > http://www.de.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/autofs/v4/ :-) > > Being used to a different directory layout, I looked into the testing > directories and didn't notice there was an actual 4.0.0 version. Wee. The 4.0.0 release has only a few bug fixes and is not greatly different from 4.0.0pre10. Please use 4.1.0-beta3 unless it's 4.1.0 by the time you get it. And we should end this off topic thread now I guess. -- ,-._|\ Ian Kent / \ Perth, Western Australia *_.--._/ E-mail: raven@themaw.net v Web: http://themaw.net/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||