lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: lilo and system maps?
From
Date
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 18:53, Robert L. Harris wrote:
> I'm messing around on one of my dev machines which has 4 possible
> kernels installed. 2.4, 2.4-stable, 2.6, 2.6-stable (stable is the last
> known good kernel). I currently have my System.map files laid out as:
>
> /boot/System.map-2.6.0-test11-bk2
> /boot/System.map-2.6.0-test10-bk4
> etc.
^^^

> This way when I install a new kernel I can copy the System.map to
> /boot/System.map-2.6 instead of keeping up with all the version numbers?
> lilo doesn't seem to like the map= arguements. Does the kernel need the
> System.map in a single place, can it figure out where it's at for a
> multiple config?

Just stick with the System.map-$(uname -r) variant and it will just work
automaticly. map= in lilo is not for System.map's.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.205 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site