Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: lilo and system maps? | From | Andre Tomt <> | Date | Thu, 04 Dec 2003 19:09:48 +0100 |
| |
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 18:53, Robert L. Harris wrote: > I'm messing around on one of my dev machines which has 4 possible > kernels installed. 2.4, 2.4-stable, 2.6, 2.6-stable (stable is the last > known good kernel). I currently have my System.map files laid out as: > > /boot/System.map-2.6.0-test11-bk2 > /boot/System.map-2.6.0-test10-bk4 > etc. ^^^
> This way when I install a new kernel I can copy the System.map to > /boot/System.map-2.6 instead of keeping up with all the version numbers? > lilo doesn't seem to like the map= arguements. Does the kernel need the > System.map in a single place, can it figure out where it's at for a > multiple config?
Just stick with the System.map-$(uname -r) variant and it will just work automaticly. map= in lilo is not for System.map's.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |