[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.0 performance problems
On Wed, Dec 31 2003, Roger Luethi wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:33:06 -0500, Thomas Molina wrote:
> > If I am understanding you, you would like data on 2.5.27, 2.5.38, and
> > 2.5.39. I'll do it if it will help something. I'll look at it in the
> Thanks. 2.5.39 alone will do, actually. I'm just curious how far the
> similarity between qsbench and bk export goes.

2.5.39 is when the deadline io scheduler was merged. How do you define
the qsbench suckiness? Do you have numbers for 2.4.x and 2.6.1-rc with
the various io schedulers (it would be interesting to see stock,
elevator=deadline, and elevator=noop).

Jens Axboe

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.087 / U:5.736 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site