lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.0 performance problems
On Wed, Dec 31 2003, Roger Luethi wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:33:06 -0500, Thomas Molina wrote:
> > If I am understanding you, you would like data on 2.5.27, 2.5.38, and
> > 2.5.39. I'll do it if it will help something. I'll look at it in the
>
> Thanks. 2.5.39 alone will do, actually. I'm just curious how far the
> similarity between qsbench and bk export goes.

2.5.39 is when the deadline io scheduler was merged. How do you define
the qsbench suckiness? Do you have numbers for 2.4.x and 2.6.1-rc with
the various io schedulers (it would be interesting to see stock,
elevator=deadline, and elevator=noop).

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.246 / U:0.692 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site