lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.6.0 performance problems
    On Wed, Dec 31 2003, Roger Luethi wrote:
    > On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:33:06 -0500, Thomas Molina wrote:
    > > If I am understanding you, you would like data on 2.5.27, 2.5.38, and
    > > 2.5.39. I'll do it if it will help something. I'll look at it in the
    >
    > Thanks. 2.5.39 alone will do, actually. I'm just curious how far the
    > similarity between qsbench and bk export goes.

    2.5.39 is when the deadline io scheduler was merged. How do you define
    the qsbench suckiness? Do you have numbers for 2.4.x and 2.6.1-rc with
    the various io schedulers (it would be interesting to see stock,
    elevator=deadline, and elevator=noop).

    --
    Jens Axboe

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.019 / U:59.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site