[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x
On 2003.12.30 13:44, James Bottomley wrote:
> If people will have me, I am prepared to take on that responsibility.
> I am just concerned that I may not have enough of a variety of devices
> to be able to thoroughly test it (unless the DI-30 is the only one :-)).
> What do people see as the requirements to be able to maintain ide-scsi?
> Well...there's currently not a long line of people wanting to do this,
> so feel free to send in patches (at least cc'd to linux-scsi so I can
> pick them up easily), and we'll see how it goes.

OK. You did see the patch that came with the original, right? I just sent
it to linux-kernel because the audience there is broader.

Linus wants Jens to look at it, so I'm waiting for his response.

> In the long term, I think libata will end up assuming much of the role
> that ide-scsi does now, but since it doesn't interface to a lot of
> existing motherboard chipsets, we're going to need ide-scsi around for a
> while at least.

Exactly. Thanks, Willem Riede.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.055 / U:0.684 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site