Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:18:20 -0500 | | From | Willem Riede <> | | Subject | Re: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x |
| |
On 2003.12.30 13:44, James Bottomley wrote: > If people will have me, I am prepared to take on that responsibility. > I am just concerned that I may not have enough of a variety of devices > to be able to thoroughly test it (unless the DI-30 is the only one :-)). > What do people see as the requirements to be able to maintain ide-scsi? > > Well...there's currently not a long line of people wanting to do this, > so feel free to send in patches (at least cc'd to linux-scsi so I can > pick them up easily), and we'll see how it goes.
OK. You did see the patch that came with the original, right? I just sent it to linux-kernel because the audience there is broader.
Linus wants Jens to look at it, so I'm waiting for his response.
> In the long term, I think libata will end up assuming much of the role > that ide-scsi does now, but since it doesn't interface to a lot of > existing motherboard chipsets, we're going to need ide-scsi around for a > while at least.
Exactly. Thanks, Willem Riede. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |