lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: IDE-SCSI oops in 2.6.0-test11
From
Date
Linus,

Cool bananas. I have applied the patch and it has fixed the oops. Many
thanks for the quick reply and patch.

Cheers,

Ross

PS: How about "The Beaver has left the Priory" (or for non UK, "The Beaver
has left the clinic").

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ross Alexander "We demand clearly defined
MIS - NEC Europe Limited boundaries of uncertainty and
Work ph: +44 20 8752 3394 doubt."



Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
02/12/2003 06:37 p.m.

To: ross.alexander@uk.neceur.com
cc: Ed Sweetman <ed.sweetman@wmich.edu>, Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Subject: Re: IDE-SCSI oops in 2.6.0-test11




On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 ross.alexander@uk.neceur.com wrote:
>
> I can't get the source, otherwise I would have compiled it against
> 2.6.0. However I don't find this point particularly relevant since
> 2.6.0 should be backward compatible with 2.4,0, atleast at the binary
> level.
>
> I tried the earlier versions of dvdrtools and cdrtools and their didn't
> like ide-cd. This version (cdrecord-dvdpro) does but it still don't
> alter the fact that while using ide-scsi is no longer recommended, it
> still should work.

Well, we're trying, but nobody has had a lot of luck with it.

However, your particular case looks pretty straightforward:

> Here the the oops again.
>
> Dec 2 12:02:46 mig27 kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
dereference at virtual address 00000000
> Dec 2 12:02:46 mig27 kernel: printing eip:
> Dec 2 12:02:46 mig27 kernel: 00000000

Somebody jumped through a NULL pointer, and it was:

> Dec 2 12:02:46 mig27 kernel: Process cdrecord-prodvd (pid: 369,
threadinfo=e4160000 task=f65d4100)
> Dec 2 12:02:46 mig27 kernel: Call Trace:
> Dec 2 12:02:46 mig27 kernel: [<f9859b1b>]
idescsi_transfer_pc+0x11b/0x120 [ide_scsi]

That's the code that does:

...
if (test_bit (PC_DMA_OK, &pc->flags)) {
set_bit (PC_DMA_IN_PROGRESS, &pc->flags);
(void) (HWIF(drive)->ide_dma_begin(drive));
}
...
and it looks like the PC_DMA_OK flag is incorrect.

Doing a bit more digging shows that "idescsi_issue_pc()" seems to use some
variables without ever actually _initializing_ them. How about this
trivial one-liner? Does that make it work for you?

Jens? Comments?

Linus

---
===== drivers/scsi/ide-scsi.c 1.33 vs edited =====
--- 1.33/drivers/scsi/ide-scsi.c Tue Nov 18 23:40:45 2003
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/ide-scsi.c Tue Dec 2 10:36:33 2003
@@ -516,6 +516,7 @@
pc->actually_transferred=0; /* We haven't transferred
any data yet */
pc->current_position=pc->buffer;
bcount.all = IDE_MIN(pc->request_transfer, 63 * 1024);
/* Request to transfer the entire buffer at once */
+ feature.all = 0;

if (drive->using_dma && rq->bio) {
if (test_bit(PC_WRITING, &pc->flags))

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site