Messages in this thread | | | From | (bill davidsen) | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.6.0 batch scheduling, HT aware | Date | 30 Dec 2003 00:32:03 GMT |
| |
In article <3FED4838.6050908@kolumbus.fi>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mika_Penttil=E4?= <mika.penttila@kolumbus.fi> wrote:
| heh...and the situation gets even worse when you add cpus, with 16way | you get only 1/16 of the speed ;)
No, not when you add CPUs, when you add siblings. There's a big difference, since sibs compete for cache on the chip, and some execution units (FPU?). -- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |