[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Page aging broken in 2.6
    On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 19:00:45 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > The current behaviour seems better from a theoretical point of view. All
    > we want to know is the reference pattern - whether it is one process
    > referencing the page frequently or 100 processes referencing it
    > infrequently shouldn't matter. And if we want to give mapped pages more

    It can matter. Evicting a page that is infrequently referenced by many
    processes increases the chance that all runnable processes block waiting
    for that same page later. The likelihood of that happening grows under
    memory pressure, when "infrequently" may actually be "quite often" and
    when disk I/O is congested (resulting in higher disk access times).

    You won't have the same effect when evicting a page that is referenced
    by one process only, no matter how frequently.

    Having all processes blocked is indeed one problem of 2.6 under memory
    pressure. I don't know what the cause is, though.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.021 / U:23.144 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site