[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: GCC 3.4 Heads-up
    Followup to:  <>
    By author: Andy Isaacson <>
    In newsgroup:
    > On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 08:34:33PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > > The cast/conditional expression as lvalue are _particularly_ ugly
    > > extensions, since there is absolutely zero point to them. They are very
    > > much against what C is all about, and writing something like this:
    > >
    > > a ? b : c = d;
    > >
    > > is something that only a high-level language person could have come up
    > > with. The _real_ way to do this in C is to just do
    > >
    > > *(a ? &b : &c) = d;
    > >
    > > which is portable C, does the same thing, and has no strange semantics.
    > But doesn't the first one potentially let the compiler avoid spilling to
    > memory, if b and c are both in registers?
    > Not that I'm fond of gccisms, but this one at least seems to have a
    > potential value. And I'm sure I came up with an instance of it making
    > my head ache, a while back, but I can't come up with a bad example now.
    > Care to elaborate on your "strange semantics"?

    A decent compiler should be able to avoid spills in either case.

    <> at work, <> in private!
    If you send me mail in HTML format I will assume it's spam.
    "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
    Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.025 / U:185.328 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site