lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: DevFS vs. udev
From
Date
Le mer 24/12/2003 à 14:44, Ian Soboroff a écrit :
> Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr> writes:
>
> > I have to admit that devfs is the best, hands down, at a crucial lkml
> > exercise: the flamefest. It seems even after it'll die, it will continue
> > to attract devotees and flames.
>
> Perhaps the devfs devotees will maintain their code in BK, and we can
> merge two perennial lkml flamewars into one.

BK flames seem so passé to me. Throw in a new durable API to enable
binary-only device drivers, and you just built the perfect flamethrower.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.117 / U:0.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site