Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: DevFS vs. udev | From | Xavier Bestel <> | Date | Wed, 24 Dec 2003 15:17:57 +0100 |
| |
Le mer 24/12/2003 à 14:44, Ian Soboroff a écrit : > Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr> writes: > > > I have to admit that devfs is the best, hands down, at a crucial lkml > > exercise: the flamefest. It seems even after it'll die, it will continue > > to attract devotees and flames. > > Perhaps the devfs devotees will maintain their code in BK, and we can > merge two perennial lkml flamewars into one.
BK flames seem so passé to me. Throw in a new durable API to enable binary-only device drivers, and you just built the perfect flamethrower.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |