![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
At some point in the past, rusty wrote: >> In 2.7, my aim is to switch the rest of them, move more things to >> per-cpu rather than [NR_CPUS] arrays, add the more efficient dynamic >> per-cpu allocation, and spread the per-cpu religion by fire and the >> sword. On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 07:18:35PM -0800, Paul Jackson wrote: > For folks doing really large cpu counts, like my employer, this might > become of interest sooner. On the other hand, we do really large memory > as well, so this might not be especially critical to us. > If NR_CPUS arrays start to annoy us sooner, I'll know where to consult. This is primarily for the purpose of data placement, i.e. for node-local per-cpu elements. That said, to each his own. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:59 [W:0.431 / U:0.040 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||