lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Oops with 2.4.23
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 01:36:12PM -0500, Disconnect wrote:
> Evidently many people can look at an oops or crash path and be 90%
> certain its bad/misperforming memory. (How they do this I don't
> know..) I've noticed that 'check your ram' is not always given as the
> answer, but it seems that most of the time when it is given its also
> correct.

Single bit changes on high bits (especially when they're not used in any bit
tests), are usually suspect from what I see on the list...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.834 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site