Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 22 Dec 2003 10:50:07 -0800 | From | Mike Fedyk <> | Subject | Re: Oops with 2.4.23 |
| |
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 01:36:12PM -0500, Disconnect wrote: > Evidently many people can look at an oops or crash path and be 90% > certain its bad/misperforming memory. (How they do this I don't > know..) I've noticed that 'check your ram' is not always given as the > answer, but it seems that most of the time when it is given its also > correct.
Single bit changes on high bits (especially when they're not used in any bit tests), are usually suspect from what I see on the list... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |