Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 22 Dec 2003 09:41:10 -0800 | From | "Randy.Dunlap" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.0 incorrect memory sizing (without a full BIOS).. |
| |
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:31:48 -0800 William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote:
| On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 05:04:25AM +0000, Dave Airlie wrote: | > I've got an internal development board based on the Intel 815 | > chipset and the Intel ACSFL mini-BIOS for embedded systems, and then using | > grub 0.93 to boot Linux. | > under 2.4 my memory is correctly sized at 256MB, but under 2.6 I'm only | > seeing 64MB, | [... e88/e820 snipped ...] | > So is this 2.6 just being more fussy about the contents of the e820 that | > my "BIOS" is supplying and falling back to the old style detection? | | We've had one other report of something like this. I don't see any | obvious reason why setup.S should be failing in 2.6; diff below. It | could be some kind of binutils issue. | | Could I get dmesg and .config from 2.4 and 2.5?
Did we ever get these message logs and config files?
-- ~Randy MOTD: Always include version info. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |