lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [test] exec-shield vs. paxtest 0.9.5 horrible results
FromArjan van de Ven <>
DateMon, 22 Dec 2003 12:09:49 +0100
On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 11:54, Gabor MICSKO wrote:
> gmicsko03:/home/trey/devel/exploit/paxtest-0.9.5# uname -a
> Linux gmicsko03 2.6.0 #1 Thu Dec 18 12:32:44 CET 2003 i686 GNU/Linux

applications have the option to disable exec-shield themselves for them.
pax-test at one point did this deliberately (in order to simulate glibc
2.2 behavior according to the author); are you using a version of
paxtest that does this ?

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:59    [W:0.534 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans