[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: lot of VM problem with 2.4.23
    On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 09:03:44AM +0200, Ville Herva wrote:
    > On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 11:23:38PM +0100, you [Willy Tarreau] wrote:
    > > >
    > > > Dec 21 22:08:44 stock kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
    > > > Dec 21 22:08:44 stock kernel: OOM: nr_swap_pages=0cd865e6c c012e1e8 c0262e3c 00000000 000001d2 00000000 00000001 cd863c00
    > >
    > > OK, so there's no available swap anymore (nr_swap_pages=0, Marcelo forgot the
    > > '\n' in the patch). I simply think that with other kernels, you're very short
    > > of memory, but it runs, while with this one, all memory gets consumed, and
    > > since there's no smart oom killer, one process has to get killed.
    > BTW, I have a box with 128MB ram and 512MB swap running 2.4.21-jam1 (it has
    > the -aa vm). I can't shut it down cleanly, because trying it goes into
    > endless loop trying to free memory when turning off swap. Nothing but
    > alt-sysrq-b seems to work.
    > I don't know if there is a kernel memory leak, since all user level
    > processes should be killed at that point, right? Unfortunately I didn't have
    > time to dig deeper, as the box is in (sort of) production.

    if this is a leak, I doubt it has been introduced recently, the only
    swap accounting related change was in the shm layer, and it was supposed
    to be a race fix. You may want to check if you've some shm allocated
    in /dev/shm or ipcs, while the machine reboots.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.019 / U:18.648 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site