![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 01:36:51PM -0800, Peter C. Norton wrote: > Ian has lots of bugfixes and and feature patches (like direct mounts) > going to the autofs mailing list. Autofs4 has always had stability > issues in 2.4.x, and its been lacking in features. This makes myself > and others run a bastard combination of amd, autofs and editing > /etc/fstab to get "automounter" features even close to the solaris > automounter. If these can go into 2.4, which will be "stable" and in > use in lots of places for the next couple of years it could help by > encouraging the distros to get behind autofs4 (hint hint, redhat, > hint). Well, it looks like you're a bit later for 2.4 with that. Get them into 2.6 and if they prove good we can backport the bugfix portions. As for Red Hat: I'll bet the next Red Hat product will be based on a 2.6 kernel, as is fedora as their public beta testing community whizbang version. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||