![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Em Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:09:04PM +0100, Stephan von Krawczynski escreveu: > On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:03:15 -0200 > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br> wrote: > > > Em Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:54:36PM +0100, Ionut Georgescu escreveu: > > > I can only second that. We've been using XFS here since the days of > > > 2.4.0-testxx and the only problems we've had were sitting between the > > > chair and the keyboard. > > > > So if there is no problems at all using it as a patch why add this to a > > kernel that is phasing out? > > Because it is _not_. So what? You disagree, what is the problem of keeping a patch out of the tree if the tree is getting in deep freeze? > I really wonder how many of you have read this list up to 2.4.11 release ... > > Is there some human-memory-loss-virus flooding the area ? > > Please stay serious. I'm staying, please stay too. And I was on this list _way_ before 2.4.11, 2.6 has, IMHO, a different story. - Arnaldo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||