lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [OT] linux.bkbits.net
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:37:09AM +0100, Ihar 'Philips' Filipau wrote:
>
>> It is rather strange to 'bk pull http://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5'
>>and to find in Makefile:
>>VERSION = 2
>>PATCHLEVEL = 6
>>SUBLEVEL = 0
>>EXTRAVERSION =
>> Or it is only me who finds this strange?
>> When transition from 2.5 to 2.6 is planned?
>> After all stable branch deserve to have NOT odd version number :)
>
>
> You may have missed Linus' announcement: 2.6.0 has been released.
>

Yes. No. Br-r-r-r.
I'm not about Linux kernel version.

I'm about its name in BK :-)

--
Ihar 'Philips' Filipau / with best regards from Saarbruecken.
-- _ _ _
Because the kernel depends on it existing. "init" |_|*|_|
literally _is_ special from a kernel standpoint, |_|_|*|
because its' the "reaper of zombies" (and, may I add, |*|*|*|
that would be a great name for a rock band).
-- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.067 / U:1.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site