![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Christian Meder wrote: >On Sat, 2003-12-20 at 04:50, Nick Piggin wrote: > >>(although not much Con) >> > >right. Ok I'm running now 2.6.0 with Nick's v28p1: The results without >load and with kernel compile load are attached. On nice level 0 I get >now the stuttering sound which I described in the previous mail. When I >renice gnomemeeting to -10 it's actually usable but not as good as in >2.4.2x. It's still sensitive to window movement and X activity. Two >subjective observations are that the nice levels haven't got such a big >impact in Nick's scheduler they used to have and that the default >behaviour gnomemeetingwise is better than in earlier Nick schedulers. > No, nice levels don't have such a big impact. That is the last big think I have to fix, but thats another story... At nice -10, there is basically nothing more the scheduler can do for it (nice -20 will be a tiny bit better again). I'd say its due to either sound drivers or your app doing something different when running in 2.6. > > >>This might be a problem - try turning unmaskirq on, and possibly >>32-bit IO support on (hdparm -u1 -c1 /dev/hda). I think there is >>a remote possibility that doing this will corrupt your data just >>to let you know. >> > >Tried it and doesn't make a difference. > dang > >>So the 1 gnomemeeting process is doing everything? (except display of >>course) >> > >AFAIK yes. > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||