lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ??
John Bradford (john@grabjohn.com) wrote:

> I think we should consider introduce a policy of having .*beaver.*
> names for each 2.6.x release, and maybe drop the version numbers
> altogether during 2.7.
>
> John.

Sounds like a cool idea, but how are we supposed to know which "name"
is newer?

--
-
( ) ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail
X
/ \
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.075 / U:0.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site