Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:11:55 -0500 | From | Karim Yaghmour <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Updating real-time and nanokernel maintainers |
| |
Nick Piggin wrote: > I agree with Zwane. People have enough trouble using MAINTAINERS > as it is. Using it to pat each others backs makes it less useful.
I understand what you mean.
> As Zwane said, neither have code in the kernel, so I don't see how > you think it is justified...?
It is justified in the same way that the RTLinux entry was justified for those many years. But the bottom line is as I said it before, I personally have no take in this, and I certainly don't want to start a debate on the use of the MAINTAINERS file, others are much more apt than myself to make the proper judgement call on the proper use of that file.
Karim -- Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits http://www.opersys.com || karim@opersys.com || 514-812-4145
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |