[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ??
    >> > I think we should consider introduce a policy of having .*beaver.*
    >> > names for each 2.6.x release, and maybe drop the version numbers
    >> > altogether during 2.7.
    >> >
    >> > John.
    >> Sounds like a cool idea, but how are we supposed to know which "name"
    >> is newer?
    > The names could be chosen alphabetically. Rooster was mentioned for
    > 2.7, but since 2.6 is beaver, I propose cock, as 'c' follows 'b'.

    Oh great.
    So now we've progressed from flamewars to cock fighting on LKML.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.019 / U:3.816 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site