[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ??
>> > I think we should consider introduce a policy of having .*beaver.*
>> > names for each 2.6.x release, and maybe drop the version numbers
>> > altogether during 2.7.
>> >
>> > John.
>> Sounds like a cool idea, but how are we supposed to know which "name"
>> is newer?
> The names could be chosen alphabetically. Rooster was mentioned for
> 2.7, but since 2.6 is beaver, I propose cock, as 'c' follows 'b'.

Oh great.
So now we've progressed from flamewars to cock fighting on LKML.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.082 / U:0.480 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site