![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:22:35AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > Any PCI-Ex drivers would obviously _know_ they are PCI Ex, and they > > could communicate that by virtue of simply using new functions. Older > > drivers for older hardware would use the old API and not care... > > Further, PCI-Ex operations are already basically readl/writel anyway, so > > going through the forest of pci_cfg_ops pointers and such would just add > > needless layering. > > BUT powermanagement and co will need to potentially do stuff too with the > config space... And X11 will want to access it via /proc interfaces. And someone will eventually go and design a different way to access PCI-EX for their hardware 8) The PCI layer is a nice abstraction and config space is slow anyway - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||