lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Catching NForce2 lockup with NMI watchdog
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, Bill Davidsen wrote:

> > Well, the NMI watchdog is a side-effect feature that works by chance
> > rather than by design. So you can't really complain it doesn't work
> > somewhere, although I wouldn't mind if new hardware was designed such that
> > it works. You shouldn't have to use "acpi=force" for the watchdog to work
> > though and for a PII system if "nmi_watchdog=1" doesn't work, then I
> > suspect a BIOS bug (set APIC_DEBUG to 1 in asm-i386/apic.h and send me the
> > bootstrap log and a dump from `mptable' for a diagnosis, if interested).
>
> Has the check to see if the BIOS is old than very recent been removed? I
> used to get a message that the BIOS was too old, I believe that's what
> prompted the acpi to enable the local apic. Sorrt, I've been running that
> feature since 2.5.3x or so and I just carried it forward.

I don't know what check you refer to, sorry. I don't think we do any
version checks in the APIC code. Perhaps ACPI does some, but having no
use for it anywhere I'm not familiar with that area.

If the "nmi_watchdog=1" option doesn't work for a PII system, then its
most likely a bug in BIOS IRQ routing tables -- either missing or broken
entries for the 8254 timer and/or the 8259A ExtINTA source.

--
+ Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans