lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 14 Dec 2003 15:44:23 -0800
FromLarry McVoy <>
SubjectRe: RFC - tarball/patch server in BitKeeper
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:05:03AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 09:21:56 -0800, > Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> wrote:
> >I've prototyped an extension to BitKeeper that provides tarballs
> >and patches.  ...> >... You need to understand that this is all you get,
> >we're not going to extend this so you can do anything but track the most
> >recent sources accurately.  No diffs.  No getting anything but the most
> >recent version.  No revision history.  
> 
> Do we get the changelogs from each BK check in?  Without the
> changelogs, patches are going to be much less useful.

You already get those, use BK/Web.  It's all there and always has been.
-- 
---
Larry McVoy              lm at bitmover.com          http://www.bitmover.com/lm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2008