[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.4 vs 2.6
    On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 20:08, Jan Rychter wrote:
    > So please be careful when making statements like that. 2.6 is *NOT*
    > stable enough nor ready enough for people to use it, unless those people
    > have a narrow range of hardware on which the 2.6 kernel has actually
    > been tested (translation: they have the same hardware as the main
    > developers do).

    I have a brand-spanken-new laptop (less than a month old), and all my
    hardware works great. In fact, ATI drivers (only in pre-release X) only
    work on 2.6, and ACPI never worked on 2.4. So, it works better for me
    than on 2.4. Please be careful when saying that 2.4 is better than 2.6,
    it's only that way for a narrow set of hardware.
    Daniel Gryniewicz <>
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.019 / U:10.792 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site