lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] improve rwsem scalability (was Re: [CFT][RFC] HT scheduler)


Nick Piggin wrote:

>
>
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Nick Piggin wrote:
>>
>>
>>> getting contended. The following graph is a best of 3 runs average.
>>> http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/rwsem.png
>>>
>>
>> the graphs are too noise to be conclusive.
>>
>>
>>> The part to look at is the tail. I need to do some more testing to see
>>> if its significant.
>>>
>>
>> yes, could you go from 150 to 300?
>>
>
> The benchmark dies at 160 rooms unfortunately. Probably something in
> the JVM.
>
> I'll do a larger number of runs around the 130-150 mark.
>

OK, this is an average of 5 runs at 145, 150, 155 rooms with my scheduler
patches, with and without my rwsem patch. Its all over the place, but I
think
rwsem does give a small but significant improvement.

http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/rwsem2.png

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.311 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site