Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 12 Dec 2003 20:40:04 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause? |
| |
Hi!
> OSL 1 and 2 are a preferred choice as they are slowly creaping into the > kernel. The beauty and pain of OSL is that SCO would be a NOOP. The > requirement imposed on the contributing author to indemnify (sp really > bad) the changes/patches to the codebase core, makes it a better world. > In short code sets of questionable origin are the liabities of the author > and not the community.
Hmm, remind me to never ever touch anything under OSL. Copyright is different in different countries and having $1e9 lawsuit going after _me_ just because U.S. laws are crazy does not seem funny to me.
Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |