![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 05:02:01PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > Now I need to change the order (it is using Mem: and Swap: first, and the > > other more thurough method second), but I'm wondering what versions of the > > kernel I'd be cutting out if I just removed the parsing of Mem: and Swap:... > > IIRC 2.2 kernels already had the one-value-per-line > memory statistics, so you'd only lose 2.0 and earlier. Ahh, great. I'll change the ordering. Should help clean up the code a bit and make adding the features I want easier. :) Another question: Inact_dirty: 21516 kB Inact_laundry: 65612 kB Inact_clean: 19812 kB These three are seperate lists in rmap, and are equal to "Inactive:" in the -aa vm. Inact_target: 150080 kB This doesn't account any memory, but is only what the VM is trying to size the sum of the three lists above. Do I have that right? I'm going to graph active and inactive for lrrd, and I need to know how to map the different values when it is run on a rmap kernel. Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||