Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:16:38 +1100 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [CFT][RFC] HT scheduler |
| |
Rhino wrote:
>On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:14:45 +1100 >Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote: > > >>You won't be able to merge mine with Ingo's. Which one put the box on >>steroids? :) >> > >sorry if i wasn't clearly enough, but i merged each one of them separately on top of a wli-2. >that comment was for the wli changes. :) > > >>Wonder whats going on here? Is this my patch vs Ingo's with nothing else >>applied? >>How does plain 2.6.0-test11 go? >> >>Thanks for testing. >> > > >ok, this time on a plain test11. >
I mean, what results does test11 get when running the benchmarks.
> >hackbench: > > w26 sched-SMT-C1 > > 50 5.026 50 5.182 > 100 10.062 100 10.602 > 150 15.906 150 16.214 > > >time tar -xvjpf linux-2.6.0-test11.tar.bz2: > > w26 sched-SMT-C1 > > real 0m21.835s real 0m21.827s > user 0m20.274s user 0m20.412s > sys 0m4.178s sys 0m4.260s > ^^^^^^^^ OK I guess the real 43s in your last set of results was a typo.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |