[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?
    On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 02:18:00PM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote:
    > interfaces, the EXPORT_GPL stuff, all of that as a way to delibrately

    forget EXPORT_GPL, that's an hint, all _GPL can be removed, and any
    EXPORT_SYMBOL can be added. what is a derived work or not, what is legal
    or not, has nothing to do with whatever EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL or even with

    Clearly if we export everything with EXPORT_SYMBOL we make life easier
    to illegal people, that's why using EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL can make sense,
    but any distributor is free to drop all _GPL tags everywhere, and export
    every single kernel function with EXPORT_SYMBOL. If somebody than makes
    a derived work through those exported symbols illegally, that's his own
    problem. The distributor has no control on the export symbol users.

    just look vmmon, that's a derived work with a non GPL compatible
    licence, it does everything through exported symbols but it doesn't mean
    it's not a derivative work.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.018 / U:6.476 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site