[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: State of devfs in 2.6?
    On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:42:54PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
    > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:10:47PM -0500, Mark Mielke wrote:
    > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:21:56AM +0100, Holger Schurig wrote:
    > > > Devfs for embedded devices is just great. It's all in the kernel, no
    > > > external process to run (I use my embedded stuff without devfsd). I'm using
    > > > it for about one year with various kernels.
    > >
    > > I don't see why 'all in the kernel' is the best approach, embedded or
    > > otherwise. I believe udev is being written to execute with a minimal
    > > runtime environment. No glibc, or other such beasts.
    > Exactly. The current bk tree version of udev (which has more features
    > than the 008 release) is weighing in at 49Kb, linked statically, no
    > external dependancies.

    And if we are talking about the smaller embedded systems it
    would be good to remember that their /dev doesn't really
    change much so devfs and udev could be left out entirely by
    having a small staticly populated /dev in the
    initramfs/initrd image, or whatever is used for /.

    J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies
    email address:

    Remember Cernan and Schmitt
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.021 / U:214.960 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site