![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On approximately Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 11:40:06AM -0800, Eric Sandall wrote: > Quoting Samuel Kvasnica <samuel.kvasnica@tuwien.ac.at>: > > It was local APIC ! After recompiling 2.4.22 without local apic > > everything works smoothly since several weeks. I wonder when there'll > > be a kernel > > patch that really solves these nforce2/amd issues. > > Sam > > Disabling local APIC on 2.6.0-test9-mm2 also fixes this (I haven't tried on > earlier kernels). > > -sandalle > I am seeing the same thing here. Disk activity and APIC don't seem to do well. What kind of performance hit if any are we taking by disabling APIC? -- Josh McKinney | Webmaster: http://joshandangie.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | They that can give up essential liberty Linux, the choice -o) | to obtain a little temporary safety deserve of the GNU generation /\ | neither liberty or safety. _\_v | -Benjamin Franklin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:58 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||