![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wednesday 05 of November 2003 09:40, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04 2003, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: > > ChangeSet 1.1413, 2003/11/04 08:01:30-08:00, > > B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl > > > > [PATCH] fix rq->flags use in ide-tape.c > > > > Noticed by Stuart_Hayes@Dell.com: > > Guys, this is _way_ ugly. We definitely dont need more crap in ->flags > for private driver use, stuff them somewhere else in the rq. rq->cmd[0] > usage would be a whole lot better. This patch should never have been > merged. If each and every driver needs 5 private bits in ->flags, > well... Yeah, it is ugly. Using rq->cmd is also ugly as it hides the problem in ide-tape.c, but if you prefer this way I can clean it up. I just wanted minimal changes to ide-tape.c to make it working. > Was this even posted on linux-kernel for review? Yes. --bartlomiej > > @@ -218,6 +223,11 @@ > > #define REQ_PM_SUSPEND (1 << __REQ_PM_SUSPEND) > > #define REQ_PM_RESUME (1 << __REQ_PM_RESUME) > > #define REQ_PM_SHUTDOWN (1 << __REQ_PM_SHUTDOWN) > > +#define REQ_IDETAPE_PC1 (1 << __REQ_IDETAPE_PC1) > > +#define REQ_IDETAPE_PC2 (1 << __REQ_IDETAPE_PC2) > > +#define REQ_IDETAPE_READ (1 << __REQ_IDETAPE_READ) > > +#define REQ_IDETAPE_WRITE (1 << __REQ_IDETAPE_WRITE) > > +#define REQ_IDETAPE_READ_BUFFER (1 << __REQ_IDETAPE_READ_BUFFER) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||