Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 5 Nov 2003 17:53:11 -0500 (EST) | From | Zwane Mwaikambo <> | Subject | RE: BK2CVS problem |
| |
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Chad Kitching wrote:
> From: Zwane Mwaikambo > > > + if ((options == (__WCLONE|__WALL)) && (current->uid = 0)) > > > + retval = -EINVAL; > > > > That looks odd > > > > Setting current->uid to zero when options __WCLONE and __WALL are set? The > retval is dead code because of the next line, but it looks like an attempt > to backdoor the kernel, does it not?
Yes, i was more meaning to say 'that looks like fun', good times, good times. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |