[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Disk Geometries reported incorrectly on 2.6.0-testX

On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Andrew Clausen wrote:
> Good question. From 98 up, Windows supports both LBA and CHS. I'm not
> sure about XP/2003.

I don't think it changed. CHS support is needed for backward compatibility
during boot. This is why it would be important not to screw it, if it's
indeed matter in the partition table. Some reading how NT gets/uses drive

> The real question is: what is the default install? How many users have
> each?

Google Zeitgeist says for september at

XP 38%
98 29%
2000 20%
NT 3%
95 1%

XP is growing 1-2% each month at the expense of Win9x (see{...,jun,jul,aug}03_pie.gif)

The majority of NT based uses NTFS. NTFS has its own $Boot file fixed at
sector 0, that is it's the boot sector. I don't know how much it's
different from the one booting from FAT but I guess not much (except of
understanding NTFS instead of FAT during boot, etc).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.065 / U:58.992 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site