Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 28 Nov 2003 22:18:27 +0100 | From | Jörn Engel <> | Subject | Re: hash table sizes |
| |
[pruned CC: list]
On Fri, 28 November 2003 13:35:36 -0600, Jack Steiner wrote: > > Then I still dont understand your proposal. (I probably missed some piece > of the discussion). > > You proposed above to limit the allocation to the amount of memory on a node.
Jes didn't _limit_ the allocation to the memory on a node, he _based_ it on it, instead of total memory for all nodes. Therefore a 1024 node NUMA machine with 2GB per node has no bigger hash tables, than a single CPU machine with 2GB total memory, however big that may be.
Unless I didn't understand his patch, that is. :)
Jörn
-- "Error protection by error detection and correction." -- from a university class - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |