lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: hash table sizes
[pruned CC: list]

On Fri, 28 November 2003 13:35:36 -0600, Jack Steiner wrote:
>
> Then I still dont understand your proposal. (I probably missed some piece
> of the discussion).
>
> You proposed above to limit the allocation to the amount of memory on a node.

Jes didn't _limit_ the allocation to the memory on a node, he _based_
it on it, instead of total memory for all nodes. Therefore a 1024
node NUMA machine with 2GB per node has no bigger hash tables, than a
single CPU machine with 2GB total memory, however big that may be.

Unless I didn't understand his patch, that is. :)

Jörn

--
"Error protection by error detection and correction."
-- from a university class
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.110 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site