lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 27 Nov 2003 09:48:02 +0100
FromKai Bankett <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] irq_balance does not make sense with HT but single physical CPU
> > If you had two tasks both running continuously, one per sibling, then
> not IRQ balancing will penalise the task on the sibling which is
> getting most interrupts.> 
Yes - did some more reading on HT and how the cpu looks like in that 
case ... I was thinking that interrupt lines - while in HT mode - aren´t 
available independently to both "parts" of the cpu. That was my fault - 
of course.

So just dismiss the patch - sorry.

Thanks,

Kai
[unhandled content-type:application/x-pkcs7-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [from the cache]
©2003-2008