[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.6]: IPv6: strcpy -> strlcpy
In article <> (at Thu, 27 Nov 2003 20:00:41 +0000), Russell King <> says:

> The thing that worries me is that an incorrect strlcpy() conversion
> gives the impression that someone has thought about buffer underruns
> as well as overruns, and, unless someone /has/ actually thought about
> it, there could well still be a security problem lurking there.

Hmm, what do you actually mean by "buffer underruns?"

(If I'm correct) do you suggest that we should zero-out rest of
destination buffer?

if so, we may want to have a function, say strlcpy0(), like this:

size_t strlcpy0(char *dst, const char *src, size_t maxlen)
size_t len = strlcpy(dst, src, maxlen);
if (maxlen && len < maxlen - 1)
memset(dst + len + 1, 0, maxlen - len - 1);
return len;

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.047 / U:0.424 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site