![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
first, some news 2.6.0-test11 makes same oops during second compilation of kernel. The vanilla kernel with PREEMPT always oops the same way. No matter, it's always reproductible. 2.6.0-test11 + Manfred's patch doesn't hang but I found a slab error in the logs that occured during a compilation. (I didn't find this for -test10, I was lucky ?) So, there is no more way for my system to run a kernel > -test9 without problem. >De: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> [...] >There are several sources for the "-1": My initial guess was either a bug in slab, or a bad memory cell (only one bit difference). >Thus I sent him a patch that changes multiple bits. Result: It remained a single bit change, i.e it's proven that slab doesn't write BUFCTL_END into the wrong slot. Thanks for your explanation. Should I try with L1 and/or L2 cache disable on my computer (I don't know if it's safe) ? I trust my hardware but it's better to get some facts. Jerome Pinot (between LFS/BLFS, kernel compilation and tests compilation, I will surely break kind of record about load average :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||